![]() ![]() Caregivers found assistive equipment made it easier for them to provide physical care. Conversely, use of assistive equipment could be met with ambivalence as it represented deterioration or could cause conflict within relationships. ![]() Participants were motivated to use assistive equipment when it optimised their function, enabled participation and supported their values, roles and interests. The pragmatics of choosing, using or declining assistive equipment. Enabling engagement in everyday activities 2. Three empirically developed themes demonstrate the complexities associated with the use of assistive equipment at the end of life: 1. Patients had a range of cancers and COPD. Fourteen interviews were conducted with patients and caregivers. ![]() Recorded interviews were analysed inductively and themes were constructed from the data. A semi-structured interview guide was employed to elicit community dwelling patients’ and caregivers’ perspectives about assistive equipment utilisation. Employing a pragmatic approach, purposive sampling identified participants who were interviewed in their homes. This study sought to understand factors influencing patients with advanced disease and caregivers’ utilisation of assistive equipment that enable this participation. Ongoing participation in valued and essential everyday activities remains a priority for people with advanced disease. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |